Tag Archives: english

How to study English…

I received an email ages ago, an email I’ve been ignoring because I wasn’t sure how to answer it. The essential question I was asked was how to go about studying English and specifically “imagine if a student had an A1 essay on anything that could possibly come up – how could you prepare for the actual exam?

My first thought was ‘are you a good writer?’ In the same way that you might ask someone if they are artistic or musical or good at sport. If that seems an unfair question, I apologize for freaking you out, but I do believe having a ‘way with words’ is a talent like any other.

However, if we leave aside the natural ‘writer’ in you, the problem essentially comes down to this. Don’t study and you’re guaranteed to do badly. Learn off essays (in the worst case scenario, ones you haven’t even written yourself) and you might not do much better! It all depends how flexible you’re willing to be in the exam and on whether or not you wrote these ‘A1 standard essays’ to begin with. If you did, then you have become a good writer through practice and have really engaged with the texts on the course. Well done you, you are on course to do well. If you didn’t, you’ve probably been relying too heavily on other people’s opinions without ever bothering to form your own.

The more you focus on pre-prepared answers, the less likely you are to engage with the question which is asked on the day. If you don’t twist what you know to suit the question that comes up, you will do very badly indeed. One example that springs to mind comes from last year’s leaving cert. We – like most teachers & students – had looked in detail at the theme of revenge in Hamlet. The question that appeared was “Revenge and justice are finely balanced themes in the play Hamlet“. In order to answer this question you could draw on your knowledge of the theme of revenge but you also had to be able to discuss the theme of justice – who has suffered injustice, whose job is it to deliver justice in the kingdom, what might true ‘justice’ (rather than simplistic revenge) look like? How could Hamlet achieve justice? Does he need to punish anyone else? (his mother, Ophelia?). Does he punish anyone else unfairly? (Rosencrantz & Guildenstern???) Also, how are these themes of revenge and justice connected? balanced? is it possible to get revenge and achieve justice at the same time? How does Hamlet convince himself that his revenge is in fact some kind of divine justice and that he himself is God’s appointed avenger?

Now imagine for a second that you had prepared an essay on the theme of revenge – in fact you have an ‘A1 standard essay’ learned off. You may be tempted to just write it, in fact you may lapse into some kind of auto-pilot. But your A1 standard essay won’t get you an A1. It might, in fact, only get you a C3, particularly if you have ignored the word ‘justice‘ and the phrase ‘finely balanced‘ or simply thrown them in in a tokenistic way in your introduction and conclusion. What a question like this aims to assess is the difference between the student who will just regurgitate a pre-learned answer (that they may or may not have written themselves) and the student who can think on their feet, can write well under pressure and can prove that they truly understand the play no matter what question is thrown at them. In this instance, convincing yourself that you have an A1 answer ready for ‘every possible question’ that could come up (and to be honest this is simply impossible – there are too many variations in the way that the question can be worded) may in fact become a kind of false security blanket. Because, let’s face it: if doing well in English was that simple, you’d just need a book of revision notes and the ability to rote learn them all off.

On the other hand, blindly avoiding studying English because you don’t know what will be on the exam paper is almost guaranteed to lead to an essay of complete waffle. Not knowing what you want to say AT ALL can lure you into the awful trap of just telling the story. This style of answer will get you a D3. If it’s really bad, you may even fail.

So what is the solution? Bottom line: you need to know, understand and appreciate the texts you have studied. And you need to be a good writer.

Perhaps to ‘study’ English you need to break down each section into ‘possible’ questions, come up with bullet points (including relevant quotes) and if you have time practice writing your answers under exam conditions. But if you do this, in each case respond to a very specific question – find one from a previous exam paper or google it – here’s what I found when I typed ‘Hamlet Sample Questions’ into my search engine. You can do the same for any of the poets…

In the meantime some advice:

  • Before you start writing, break the question down into key words or phrases.
  • Plan your paragraphs and ensure that you use what you know to respond in every single sentence, and every single paragraph to the question asked.
  • Avoid parroting back the question incessantly. But you must connect what you’ve said directly to the question asked. So use synonyms.
  • Ensure that you only include information which is relevant to the question asked, irrespective of how much you have to leave out to achieve this. There’s no point showing off what you know if it’s not relevant to the question asked.

In terms of studying, spend time actually thinking about the characters, themes, key moments from your single text, comparative and poetry. Know them really well. When I was doing the Leaving Cert. way back in the day I remember dreaming about W.B.Yeats and King Lear and writing things down when I woke up. Yes, I know this makes me a hopeless nerd. But then I always did love English…Meanwhile, I don’t think I ever dreamt about the life cycle of the liver fluke!

Of course being prepared means you are far more likely to do well than someone who is unprepared. But be willing to improvise, to create, to think in the exam so that you pay attention to the most important thing of all. Answering the question asked.

p.s. Studying for paper one is a whole other kettle of fish – for my opinions on what you might do to prepare for QB and the essay see this blog post.

p.p.s. Comprehensions are something you get good at through practice. I intend to write a whole other post on this. Eventually. So watch this space. But not too closely; I can’t handle the pressure…

Why study English?

I’ve just stumbled upon this essay I wrote while doing my H.Dip. It’s no masterpiece but I found it interesting (if a little cringeworthy) to read on a few levels. In many ways it’s like a time capsule, written 10yrs ago and making no reference whatsoever to visual texts, social media, blogging or digital literacy. Even some of the references read like they belong in the dark ages – literacy stats from 1997 rather than our recent PISA scores. Yet it still captures many of the aspirational, as well as purely practical reasons why I still believe fundamentally that the subject I teach matters. Hugely.

‘Justify the inclusion of English as a subject on the school curriculum’

It has been said that we only truly recognise the value of something when we are deprived of it. When a loved one dies their absence encompasses an area much larger than their presence ever did. When we fast for charity, we are hungry from the moment we begin, even though our bellies are still full. So it is with the gift of communication. Something wonderful lies hidden in the everyday acts of speaking and listening, reading, writing and understanding. We take them for granted because we cannot imagine life without them; only those deprived of such jewels truly appreciate their worth. The deaf community embrace sign language as a means of escaping their silent world; the blind use Braille to access the joys of literature. Studying English encompasses so much more than the written word – it embraces oracy and comprehension as well as reading and writing skills; it influences our ability to understand and achieve in every other subject on the curriculum; it provides us with practical skills for dealing with life outside of the classroom; and it nurtures the ‘intellectual, imaginative and emotional growth’ of the individual. In order to justify the inclusion of English as a core subject in our schools we must look at each of these areas in greater detail.

Although English is considered an adopted language on this fair island, one cannot escape or ignore its dominance in modern day Ireland. For the vast majority of Irish citizens it is our first language, the medium through which all communication takes place. If we accept this and leave the debate about the relative value of ‘Gaeilge versus Bearla’ to one side, we are still left with the issue of what exactly it means to study English as a subject. In primary school emphasis is placed on the basic literacy skills of reading and writing but upon reaching secondary school the issue becomes more complex. We make the leap from ‘learning to read’ to ‘reading to learn’.

Therefore our purpose in reading becomes an exercise in decoding the meaning of the text. We no longer write solely to practice the art of writing itself (spelling, grammar, joined writing etc.): we compose in order to express ourselves, to explore our experiences in a variety of forms, such as diary entries, autobiographical sketches, poetry and prose. We learn to express ourselves verbally within various genres – radio programmes, anecdotes, drama. Ideally, we acquire a greater sophistication in our use of language, both when comprehending and composing and a wider appreciation of the forms and functions of language.

Why then is this ability to manipulate language considered such an important part of our education? Surely the language we speak from an early age, listen to on the television and in the classroom, write when filling out forms and questionnaires, read in magazines and on billboards, (or less frequently these days, in books and newspapers) will develop naturally and seamlessly out of our everyday experience? Unfortunately, this is not the case. An OECD report from 1997 found that 25% of Irish adults were functionally illiterate. The 1998 U.N. report on poverty stated that ‘more people in Ireland are functionally illiterate than in any other industrialised country’. Furthermore, psychologists have established an irrefutable link between ability in English and general academic achievement. For the time being the vast majority of subjects are both taught and examined through the medium of the English language. The point comes down to this – those who successfully negotiate the complexities of their first language find it easier to acquire knowledge in a range of other disciplines, and to express this knowledge effectively.

The study of English also provides us with practical skills for dealing with life outside of the classroom. Students learn how to communicate information in such forms as letters, CVs, and application forms. They learn to distinguish between language used to provide factual information (such as death notices) and language used to persuade (such as advertising). In the face of capitalism, an awareness of the various ploys used to target audiences and sell products is essential for those who wish to remain in control of their spending. Social life demands that we adapt our language and behaviour depending on the situation, and the new Leaving Certificate English Syllabus lays appropriate stress upon the variety of registers we use in everyday interaction (grandiose, formal, informal, slang). The aim is to develop a sense of audience and language appropriateness in the students. Our ability to express ourselves clearly effects job interviews, telephone conversations and our relationships with those around us. Studying English is justified if it enhances even one of these areas of our lives.

Finally, the ‘intellectual, imaginative and emotional growth’ of each student is developed through the study of English. As we have already established, language proficiency enhances academic achievement. Furthermore, students are encouraged to criticise, analyse and evaluate the various texts they encounter and to place texts in direct relation to each other through the comparative component of the senior syllabus. They encounter new worlds and experiences in the novels and plays on their course and are encouraged to compose narrative works themselves, thus expanding and actively using their imagination. They encounter a range of emotional states indirectly through literature, film and drama and begin to express and thus release their own feelings through the use of language.

What then is this ‘something wonderful’ that lies hidden in the everyday use of language? For me it is the dawning realisation that language is a living, changing entity to which no fixed, immutable meanings can be ascribed. We communicate with the text as much as it communicates with us; we bring ourselves to any understanding of words and their meanings. Finally, if we can truly grasp and appreciate the notion of paradox, we can bring ourselves to a greater understanding of the human condition: of what it means to be both sentient being and animal, simultaneously good and evil, creatures who believe in a power greater than ourselves and yet have no proof. It is here that the true value of language lies, in the space where deprived of something, we recognise its true value.

Improve your grammar!

I’ve just come across this website which helps you to practice almost every error I come across in students’ writing. It’s particularly useful because it will give you immediate feedback and an explanation if you get something wrong.

Pay particular attention to fused sentences and sentence fragments. These mistakes will cost you dearly so sort it out!Also the classic error with apostrophes is to just leave them out because you’re not sure whether or not to use them, so it’s probably a good idea to sort that out too while you’re at it!

http://www.chompchomp.com/

Here’s another site that gets you to play a fun game so you can identify the parts of a sentence:

http://www.kwarp.com/portfolio/grammarninja.html

 

Personal Essay – Practice

This post is really for other teachers but if you’re a student and your mates are up for it, by all means read on and give this a go! One challenge we all face is to get the difference between short stories and personal essays absolutely clear in our heads. Of course there are often similarities – use of descriptive writing, opportunity to draw on personal experiences for inspiration, first person narration. However the fundamental differences are really important too.

  • A short story is fictional.
  • The narrator of the story can be anyone – a homeless person, a world leader, God, Hitler or a sheep.
  • You can use first person OR third person narration.
  • There is a plot, a setting, characters, a limited timescale (the tighter the better in my experience) and oftentimes a twist (again, having one is generally better than not having one in my experience!).

  • By contrast a personal essay is based on reality (but feel free to exaggerate & even make things up as long as they sound believable – here if you want to include a talking sheep you’ll also have to mention the drugs you were on when this happened!!!).
  • The speaker is YOU – you are writing as yourself, a teenager who lives in Ireland. You cannot be a sheep for a personal essay 😉
  • You will (and should) use descriptive writing but you will also use quotes from your favourite bands and anecdotes from your childhood or family and offer your thoughts and opinions and attitudes and beliefs and feelings. You may use rhetorical questions and lists and statistics. In other words, every technique available to you.
  • You are not limited to a fixed timescale – a short story is a slice of life whilst a personal essay can be a montage of various events from past to present to future, from you, to your family and friends, to other people and cultures, from local to national to global.

In order to make this REAL for my students, I recently did this experiment in class. Everyone wrote a mini personal essay of between 200 and 300 words (including me). As a prompt we began with the words “My name is ___________. Let me tell you a little bit about the kind of person I am”. Each of us was allowed to give ‘clues’ to our identity but we made it a rule that you couldn’t make it too obvious. The reason I joined in was  because they bullied me into it!!! Ok, I’m being facetious. But in reality I think it made them feel less self-conscious about ‘revealing’ themselves, laying themselves bare to each other as it were (the essence of being a good writer if you ask me!). They also insisted that I write in the persona of me as a teenage girl. Again this made absolute sense – if I started referring to my husband and child I’d really have given the game away 😉

After creating a first draft, we all typed them up, same font and font size, I checked for spelling and grammatical errors (God help me this was time consuming) and then I printed them off. The first two girls who finished (thanks Lauren and Cathy) sat down with the list of names of people in the class and five sticky notes and created groups which were a genuine mixture of personalities and which kept close friends apart. This meant they were facing a real challenge guessing who the writer was and more importantly they were getting a true insight into people in the class they might not know very well. Each group of five was given six mini-essays (all bundles included my one but no group got a bundle including any of their own). Their job was to figure out who the writer was, a variation on the game of guess who where you have a post it note stuck to your forehead and you have to figure out what famous person’s name is written on it.

All of this took place over four 40 minute classes and not rushing things was definitely the key to success. My students were also pretty brave in finding the courage to reveal themselves publicly in front of their peers. Getting me to join in led to some pretty funny moments – any student in their right mind would be mortified to be mixed up with their teacher (the one person it is absolutely NOT COOL to be similar to in any way!). We did this immediately after a week of working on and creating short stories so the contrast helped in embedding the distinction between short stories and personal essays in their brains (at least I hope so). Finally, teachers, if you grade this EVERYONE GETS AN A. You cannot and must not give someone’s personality anything less, nor did I want to – this class are a great bunch of women and I’m lucky to be their teacher. In a few weeks time we’ll come back to them and analyse them from a writing point of view – what works, what doesn’t, which bits keep the reader most engaged and entertained but in the meantime I think they’ve learned a lot about personal essays and about each other (as have I) .

Below I’ve included my effort if you want a template to work off!!!

Who am I?

I guess it really depends who you ask. My mother says I’m a ‘flibbertigibbert’, flitting from one thing to the next, never sitting still long enough to eat a decent dinner – or wash up afterwards! My father says I’m a nutcase – well actually, he sings a song “you’re a nut, beep, beep” and grabs my nose and twists it for the “beep beep” bit (funny man!) My sister tells me repeatedly that I’m ‘the adopted one’. I am a bit odd I suppose, but refusing to recognise that we’re even related is a bit harsh don’t you think?

My boyfriend says I’m pretty and smart. Far too pretty and smart to be going out with him. He’s wrong but I guess it’s nice to have someone who thinks you’re special. Special in a good way, not special in a ‘not the shapest tool in the box’ kind of way. Although on occasion I have done things that might cause people to label me a complete and utter spanner!

And me? I’m not sure how I feel about myself. Some days I think I’m just your average teenager, trying to figure it all out and not do too much homework along the way. Some days I think I’m a supersonic bolt of electric lightening sent to save the world from spinning out of control. And some days I wish, with all the power in every fibre of my being that I could just be somebody else. Just for a little while. And then those days pass and I get back to the business of just being me. It’s a tough job baby, but somebody’s gotta do it!

Macbeth intro&concl.

Introduction = road map.

Destination = question you have been asked.

Plan your route (brainstorm).

Let examiner know what directions you’ll take.

During the play, Macbeth loses but ultimately regains our sympathy

You must immediately address the question. Don’t simply agree 100% with the question – give a more balanced & detailed response:

“There is no doubt that our sympathy for Macbeth ebbs and flows throughout the play. (1) Initially, I had mixed feelings about his character – although a valiant soldier he also seemed to relish violence. (2) Following the murders of Duncan and (3) Banquo my sympathy for him declined at first but then reappeared in the face of his profound remorse. (4) However his brutal tyranny as King and his unnecessary murders of Lady Macduff and her children annihilated any sympathy I had left. (5) He never fully regained my sympathy, despite delivering a very moving speech upon hearing news of Lady Macbeth’s death”. (6) (Also discuss how the play ends)

Conclusion = highlights of your journey.

•Don’t give a summary of the story. Don’t introduce new information.

•Repeat the main idea (thesis) you’ve developed in your answer–but rephrase. Be wary of repeating exactly what you said in the introduction – change your phrasing if you repeat an idea.

•Sum up the major things you’ve learned from studying this aspect of the play.

•Show how what you have said has proven and/or disproven the question.

CONCLUSION: “Thus I only partially agree with the statement that “Macbeth loses but ultimately regains our sympathy”. His increasingly violent, volatile and reckless behaviour made it more and more difficult for me to sympathise with him, so in that sense he did lose my sympathy completely, particularly following the murders of Lady Macduff and her children. I can identify with his suicidal despair when his wife dies, and his reluctance to commit any more crimes when Macduff challenges him to fight. However, he never fully regained my sympathy because I couldn’t excuse the way he brought Scotland to its knees. Ultimately, his death seemed a fitting punishment for the bloody tyranny of his reign as King”.